Abstract data visualization background
M&A Due Diligence

Close the Gap Between What They Claim and What Contracts Say

Target companies expect you'll take their word on revenue, renewals, and obligations. Smart buyers verify. Expectica IQ analyzes every contract in the data room (and finds the ones they forgot to include) in days, not weeks—showing you the gap between management presentations and legal reality.

Management Claimed
$2.4M ARR
Contracts Show
$2.1M ARR
Gap Identified
$300K at risk
Request Demo

The Due Diligence Expectation Gap

Target companies have expectations about what you'll accept. Smart buyers verify claims with contractual reality.

“Management expects you'll believe the revenue projections. The contracts tell a different story.”

Reality check:
  • Management deck: “$2.4M ARR with high-confidence renewals”
  • Contract reality: $400K in renewals require active engagement (not auto-renew)
  • Contract reality: 3 major customers can cancel with 30-day notice
  • Contract reality: $200K revenue is one-time, not recurring
The gap: Management presented optimistic projections. Contracts show material risks they didn't disclose.

“Target expects their data room is complete. Critical contracts are missing.”

Reality check:
  • Target provides “complete” data room with 200 contracts
  • Expectica IQ scans email archives: finds 80 additional contracts
  • Missing contracts include: side letters, amendments, verbal commitments via email
  • Material obligations discovered that weren't in data room
The gap: Target expected data room was comprehensive. Email archives reveal 40% more contracts.

“Seller expects contracts transfer cleanly. Assignability issues threaten the deal.”

Reality check:
  • 127 customer contracts reviewed
  • 42 contracts prohibit assignment without consent
  • 23 contracts have Change of Control provisions triggering renegotiation
  • 8 contracts auto-terminate on acquisition
The gap: Seller expected smooth transfer. Contracts require 73 consent negotiations post-close.

Verify What Management Claims in Days, Not Weeks

Expectica IQ closes the expectation gap by analyzing every contract (including the ones they forgot to include) and showing you the delta between claims and contractual reality.

1Complete Contract Discovery

Find Every Contract—Even What's Not in the Data Room

Unlike manual review that relies on the target's data room, Expectica IQ finds contracts they forgot to include by scanning email archives for attachments, side letters, and verbal commitments.

Data room analysis:

  • Ingests entire virtual data room (thousands of contracts)
  • AI classification of every agreement

Email archive discovery:

  • Scans target's M365/Google Workspace email (with permission)
  • Finds contracts in: email attachments, sent folders, archived threads
  • Discovers: side letters, amendments, verbal commitments confirmed via email

Example Finding

📧 47 Contracts
Found outside data room
Critical discoveries:
  • 12 customer side letters with pricing commitments
  • 8 vendor agreements with minimum spend obligations
  • 3 employment agreements with change-of-control bonuses
  • 24 email commitments not reflected in formal contracts
Impact: $180K in undisclosed obligations

Revenue Reality Dashboard

Management Claims
$2.4M ARR
Contract Reality
$2.1M ARR
Gap Identified$300K ⚠️
Auto-renew (safe)$1.5M ✅
Active renewal (at risk)$400K ⚠️
One-time (not recurring)$200K ❌
Valuation adjustment: -$300K ARR = -$1.8M valuation (at 6x multiple)
2Financial Reconciliation

Verify Revenue Claims Against Contract Reality

Management presents revenue projections. Contracts show what's actually committed. Expectica IQ reconciles claims with contractual reality.

Management claims:

  • “$2.4M ARR”
  • “High-confidence renewals”
  • “Recurring revenue”

Expectica IQ verifies:

  • Contracted ARR: $2.1M (not $2.4M)
  • Auto-renewal contracts: $1.5M (safe)
  • Active renewal required: $400K (at risk)
  • One-time revenue: $200K (not recurring)
Result:

Data-driven negotiation leverage based on contractual reality.

3Assignability Risk Assessment

Know Transfer Risks Before You Close

Expectica IQ automatically classifies every contract by transfer risk, showing you which contracts require consent, renegotiation, or may block deal completion.

🔴

Prohibited Assignment (42 contracts - $1.2M ARR)

Explicit prohibition on assignment. Requires renegotiation or customer consent. Critical path items for deal completion.

🟡

Consent Required (23 contracts - $680K ARR)

Assignment allowed with counterparty consent. Requires outreach during DD or post-close. Moderate risk if consent withheld.

🟢

Transferable (62 contracts - $1.4M ARR)

Silent on assignment (implies consent) or explicitly allows assignment. Low risk, transfers automatically.

Risk Summary

51%
of revenue requires consent or renegotiation
73 customer conversations needed post-close
60-90 day delay estimated for consent process
10-15% of customers may renegotiate terms or exit
Result:

Clear roadmap of post-close integration work and associated risks.

Built for Buy-Side Deal Teams

Expectica IQ gives PE firms and corporate dev teams the tools to verify claims, find missing contracts, and quantify risks before close.

Complete Contract Discovery

Data rooms miss 20-40% of contracts. Expectica IQ scans email archives to find side letters, amendments, and commitments not in the data room.

Result: Complete contract inventory before close, not after.

Financial Reconciliation

Management claims don't always match contract reality. Expectica IQ verifies contracted ARR, auto-renewals vs. at-risk revenue, and one-time vs. recurring.

Result: Negotiation leverage based on facts, not projections.

Change of Control Detection

AI reads every contract for CoC provisions (not just keyword search), identifying auto-termination rights, renegotiation triggers, and price adjustments.

Result: Know CoC exposure before you announce, not after.

Assignability Classification

Automatically classifies contracts as Prohibited, Consent Required, or Transferable. Shows which contracts need renegotiation or customer consent.

Result: Clear roadmap of post-close integration work.

Renewal & Expiration Analysis

Identifies contracts expiring during DD and first 12 months post-close. Flags at-risk revenue requiring active renewal attention.

Result: Know which customers need attention during DD process.

Executive-Ready Reports

Generates investment committee-ready reports highlighting revenue gaps, missing contracts, assignability risks, and recommended price adjustments.

Result: Data-backed deal recommendations in days, not weeks.

Built for Every Deal Type

Platform Acquisitions

“Verify target's revenue quality, identify integration risks, assess assignability across portfolio. Know which customers need consent before announcing.”

For PE Funds

Bolt-On Acquisitions

“Find contract conflicts (competing customers, exclusivity clauses), assess integration complexity, verify synergy assumptions are contractually feasible.”

For Strategic Buyers

Carve-Outs

“Identify shared services contracts, verify which agreements transfer vs. need to be renegotiated, find TSA requirements.”

For Division Sales
AI microchip technology background

From 6-Week Manual Review to 3-Day AI Analysis

Before Expectica IQ

  • 6 weeks: Manual review of 847 contracts
  • $216K in fees: 3 analysts at $300/hour
  • Found: Material revenue discrepancy ($400K overstatement)
  • Missed: 23 contracts not in data room (discovered post-close)
  • Missed: 12 CoC provisions (triggered post-announcement, delayed close)

After Expectica IQ

  • 3 days: AI analysis of 847 contracts + email archives
  • $15K cost: vs. $216K manual review (95% reduction)
  • Found: Same $400K revenue discrepancy
  • Found: 47 additional contracts via email scan (before close)
  • Found: All 31 CoC provisions (negotiated consent pre-announcement)
95%
Cost Reduction
$201K saved
90%
Time Reduction
3 days vs 6 weeks
+47
Contracts Found
Not in data room
100%
CoC Detection
31 provisions found

“Expectica IQ found contracts our manual DD team missed. That alone justified the cost. The speed was a bonus.”

— Partner, Mid-Market PE Fund

Complete Due Diligence: Revenue + Cost Side

Most DD teams focus only on revenue contracts. But the cost side matters too.

DealTracer (Revenue Side)

  • Customer agreements, renewals, obligations
  • Revenue verification
  • Assignability assessment
  • CoC impact on revenue

SpendTracer (Cost Side)

  • Vendor agreements, SaaS contracts, services
  • Cost structure verification
  • Vendor dependencies
  • CoC impact on costs

Example: Why Both Sides Matter

Revenue Side (DealTracer):

  • “$2.4M ARR” verified as $2.1M contracted
  • Adjustment: -$300K ARR

Cost Side (SpendTracer):

  • Management claims “$800K annual SaaS spend”
  • Contracts show: $1.1M committed (auto-renewals, minimum commits)
  • Plus: 8 vendor contracts have CoC provisions allowing 20% price increase
  • Potential cost increase: +$520K ($300K hidden + $220K CoC increases)

Combined Impact:

Revenue Impact
-$300K
Cost Impact
+$520K
EBITDA Impact
-$820K
Valuation Adj.
-$4.9M
at 6x multiple

Complete DD requires both revenue and cost side analysis.

Know What You're Really Buying

Verify management claims with contractual reality. Find the contracts they forgot to include. Know assignability risks before you close.

Project-based pricing: Typically $15K-50K depending on contract volume